Imagine a compliance platform costing $12,000 annually. How much is it?
The answer depends on what it is replacing.
If automating the collection of evidence in a complicated technology system eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious work, it could be an investment worth it. The calculations would be different if a startup of seven individuals could gather the same information in only the time of a few minutes every month.
It’s a smart way to start the search for Vanta. Don’t begin by asking which one has the most features. Think about what features allow your company to save time and money.
Automated Manufacturing Comes with a Break-Even Level
Automating compliance isn’t inherently beneficial or harmful. Scale affects its value. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company that has multiple cloud environments and numerous applications. The task of collecting evidence continuously could become very high. Integrations that automate monitoring systems and collect evidence easily justify their expense.
Imagine a company of 10 people that is preparing for its initial SOC 2. Consider a startup with 10 employees in preparation for its first SOC 2.
It is important to know the difference when you are evaluating Vanta pricing. While a well-developed platform can provide a variety of capabilities However, they’re only beneficial when the organization is required by the company.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both are trusted software for compliance that is built around automation and integrations. As such, comparing their supported frameworks as well as integrations, service agreements, and individual quotes could be beneficial for companies seeking that approach.
But there’s still another decision you’ll need to make. Is your company interested in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Some companies want constant monitoring as well as automated collection of evidence. Other businesses would prefer to supply their own evidence, particularly when their workload is small.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Utilize the same model
A lot of Vanta competitors are also in the same space that emphasizes automation. It also offers lightweight platforms that are designed to focus on management rather than comprehensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is in the second category. CertAssist was developed by compliance consultants, internal auditors and other professionals, organizes controls frameworks in a central workspace. It lets you edit policies and guidelines for evidence and allows auditors to view evidence through read-only access.
It is not able to connect to operating systems or create infrastructure agents. Customers upload and choose the proof they wish to present.
Access to the Factor System into the Decision
It is evident that the removal of integrations is a disadvantage. Someone must collect evidence by hand.
This removes the requirement to integrate, and the process of compliance doesn’t require any connection to the operating environment.
Both architectures are equally good. What is the best choice for your business?
CertAssist targets teams between five and 200 people. The pricing of the service is announced rather than requiring a sales call to get the initial cost. Its official launch price is $225 per month, compared with a regular price of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Have Its Proper Place
The requirements of a 10 person start-up today might not necessarily match its needs when it has 100 or 500 employees.
Compliance can be maintained with a simple platform. As the number of employees, systems, frameworks, and requirements for evidence grow, the economics will ultimately favor more automation. It’s better to let the complex technology of compliance earn its place.
Affording fifty integrations because they look good in a table of comparisons is not worth it. They’re well worth the money in situations where the task they replace is more expensive than doing them manually.